Netanyahu is a laughing stack as usual in UN

[Jaga]

Netanyahu went to the UN, showed a picture from the book and stated that ISIS is Hamas, both of them are NAZI and that the Iran needs to be bombed.
This is how simple is world according to Netanyahu.....Even the US cannot hide that it does not agree:

US disagrees with Netanyahu on Iran, ISIS and Hamas

and the article is from Jerusalem Post, a very conservatist newspaper.

www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Politics-And-Diplomacy/US-disagrees-with-Netanyahu-on-Iran-ISIS-and-Hamas-376648

"Obviously, we’ve designated both as terrorist organizations, but ISIL poses a different threat to Western interests and to the United States," said State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki.

Jen Psaki
US State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki. (photo credit:REUTERS)

The US State Department said Monday in a press conference that it disagrees with Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's assertion during his UN speech on Monday that "ISIS and Hamas are branches of the same poisonous tree."

"Obviously, we’ve designated both as terrorist organizations, but ISIL poses a different threat to Western interests and to the United States," said State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki. "And that’s just a fact."

Later on in the speech, Netanyahu said that Iran is still a great threat to Israel's existence. He also warned that Iran is not actually willing to give up nuclear weapons but rather just wants to get rid of the sanctions against them.

In response, Psaki said that the US would like Iran to reintegrate into the international community by showing that their nuclear program is peaceful.

"I can assure anyone that an agreement reached would not be based on a charm offensive or how that impacts us, but on the facts and the details," she said. "And we’re not going to agree to a comprehensive agreement that doesn’t meet our standards and meet our threshold."

She brought up other issues, such as Iran's poor human rights record and terror funding as other factors straining the US relationship with Iran.

When asked at the press conference if she was worried about Iran wanting to use militant Shia Islam to "take over the world," Psaki said she was more concerned with getting Iran to agree to curb its nuclear activities in exchange for an easing of economic sanctions.

"I can assure you...that obviously we’re focused on the here and now, and our effort is focused on these negotiations and the upcoming deadline in November."

[Nictoshek]

Surprised he didn't bring along his charts...like he did last time.

[kaima]

Sept 30, 2014 5:01:40 GMT -7 Nictoshek said:

Surprised he didn't bring along his charts...like he did last time.

Boris and bibi! I do like Boris, hi is my favorite spy. Bibi tries hard, but will never be my favorite commedian! (Sarcasm)

It is hard to imagine the US ever disagreeing with an Israeli warhawk.

[karl]

The art and application of diplomacy is not nice nor fair in the manner of politics, for it is to protect national interest with compromises, trade offs and a bit of horse trading politics. Withen the confines of this topic, it is plain and apparent, the Americans are walking a thin rope to or not to agree with Mr. Netanyahu. There is a very valid and real reason for not to bring down their house of cards with irritating The Iranian Government. For they {Americans} need the Iranian military co-operation with a ground offensive in combating the IS. With this, to play down the substance that Mr. Netanyahu is attempting to portray in his speech with an exhibited lack of empathic understanding.

It is apparent of legal trainingof Mr. Netanyahu with his use as a metaphor in use of the poison tree, for this is a legal term in actual use as: Fruits of the poison tree. Meaning: In a court of law, the chain of evidence must be maintained with documentation. If at any link of possession that is not documented, it becomes fruit of the poison tree and is not to be admitted in a court of law as legal evidence.

In this case of use by Mr. Netanyahu, is simply a context of metaphor in the spirit of description in understandable terms of all terriost organizations follow the same origen in logic. All are branches off the same poison tree and there fore are considered as the same as Nazi. Both are/were killers and needs be treated as same.

Israel is in a sensitive position as being a nuclear armed state in the Middle East in contrast to the surrounding neighbours. It is in the context of this reality that the burden of responsibility does and will lay upon the shoulders of Israel that these nuclear weapons are cared for in a responsible manner.

Karl

[Jaga]

Guys, thanks for your reactions. Sometimes, the sense of humor in depressing situation, like Netanyahu inability to change from warmonger to descent being, is the only thing we can do in the situation.
Israel is a bully, America cannot do anything to change its friendly relationship due to pro-Israeli Congress, so lets just play his game.

Here is an interesting post from Washington Post:

Another awkward Obama-Netanyahu meeting

The old frenemies sat in the Oval Office on Wednesday, their chair legs 18 inches apart, attempting some reasonable facsimile of personal chemistry. Maybe the 12th time would be the charm.
President Obama leaned back, elegantly cross-legged. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his tie askew, planted both feet on the ground and leaned toward Obama, as if he might leap up at any moment.
Obama called his counterpart “Bibi.” Netanyahu called Obama “Mr. President.”



In their 12th meeting, and their first since this summer’s war in Gaza strained U.S.-Israeli relations, the two men exchanged the requisite pleasantries for all of six minutes. Obama renewed the “unbreakable bond” between the two countries. Netanyahu thanked Obama for his “unflinching support” of Israel.
Then came the handshake. Firm and grim, it lasted 2.2 seconds, and the two seated men looked into each other’s eyes and pumped their arms without smiling for the cameras.
Reporters had been told the two leaders would not take questions, and understandably so. That would inevitably bring up unpleasant things.
Such as: Senior Israeli officials in July reportedly accusing Secretary of State John Kerry of “a strategic terrorist attack” against the Jewish state for his efforts to negotiate a cease-fire in Gaza.
Or: Netanyahu’s incendiary (flammable) speech to the United Nations last week calling the Islamic State and Hamas “branches of the same poisonous tree.”
Instead, the leaders spoke privately, and then Obama went off to dine with Vice President Biden. The official White House schedule did not list the prime minister as a lunch guest.
Then, just two hours after Netanyahu departed, White House press secretary Josh Earnest issued a sharp denunciation of Israeli plans for a new housing project in East Jerusalem — drawing an equally pointed rejoinder from the Israelis
So, it was awkward — but not their worst. The Post’s Katie Zezima compiled a delightful anthology of past Bibi-Barry snubs and countersnubs, including the May 2011 encounter in which Netanyahu rejected as unrealistic a peace proposal the Obama administration had just floated. There was also the November 2011 hot-mike incident in which the French president called Netanyahu a “liar” and unbearable and Obama replied, “I have to deal with him even more often than you.”
Obama picked up that theme, in a more polite way, on Wednesday. “Obviously, he’s no stranger to the White House,” he said. “I think I’ve met with Bibi more than any world leader during my tenure as president.”
No stranger — but estranged.
The prime minister’s body language was that of a man suffering intestinal discomfort. As soon as the cameras went on for the brief “pool spray” (a pre-meeting photo op with a small group of journalists), Netanyahu uncrossed his legs and tugged at his lapels. He placed his left palm on his left leg and appeared to drum the fingers of his right hand on the chair. Netanyahu nodded as Obama extolled the U.S.-Israel relationship, and an “mmm” of agreement was audible when Obama said Americans “should be very proud of the contributions that we made to the Iron Dome program to protect the lives of Israelis.”
Though his spokesman would later chide Netanyahu over his settlement policy, Obama clearly had no appetite to mix it up with his Israeli counterpart with the cameras rolling.
In the Oval Office, Obama spoke delicately about making sure “Israeli citizens are safe in their own homes and schoolchildren in their schools from the possibility of rocket fire, but also that we don’t have the tragedy of Palestinian children being killed as well.” That was as close as Obama got to a criticism, and he quickly moved to the safe terrain of calling on “Arab states and Muslim countries” to “isolate the cancer of violent extremism.” Obama lamented that Netanyahu had to “work so hard during Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur,” using the gentile pronunciation “Yahm Kippur.”
After Obama’s three minutes, Netanyahu took his three, beginning with the de rigueur salute to “the continuous bond of friendship.” But then Netanyahu offered a politely worded warning to Obama not to go wobbly. “Iran seeks a deal that would lift the tough sanctions that you worked so hard to put in place and leave it as a threshold nuclear power, and I firmly hope that under your leadership that would not happen,” he said.
The leaders spoke privately for nearly two hours, longer than planned. Did the president and prime minister find some latent rapport? Or was it a particularly thorny argument? Netanyahu, in the White House driveway, ignored a question about whether reporters should “read anything into” the long session.
Guess we’ll have to wait for Meeting 13.