The progressive wing of the Democratic PartyNot long ago, self-identified
liberals were
a small minority of all Democratic self-identifiers. At the start of the previous decade, not only were
moderate Democrats a clear plurality within
the Democratic coalition, there were almost as many
self-identified conservative Democrats as there were
self-identified liberal Democrats. According to Gallup, liberals in 2000 constituted a mere 29% of
rank-and-file Democrats, barely edging out
conservatives (25%) while being swamped by
moderates, who made up 44% of the party base. The share of
liberals began to rise in 2003 and has been increasing ever since. By 2007,
liberals had caught up to
moderates, and in 2011 surpassed them. In 2014, fully 44% of
Democrats were self-described
liberals, while only 36% claimed to be
moderates. At 19%,
conservative Democrats have become an endangered species.
During President Obama’s second term, the netroots and
the progressive wing of the Democratic Party began to emerge victorious in several major intra-party fights:
Senate filibuster reform, Net Neutrality,
diplomacy with Iran and
leadership of the Federal Reserve Board, as well as
Social Security benefit levels. A pattern has emerged from these victories, with netroots organizations, established progressive advocacy operations and a handful of elected progressive Democratic leaders working together in “inside–outside” coalitions that combine large-scale grassroots activism with inside-the-beltway lobbying expertise.
Many
Democratic insiders minimize the party's divide. They note that there's broad ideological agreement on social and cultural issues, from abortion and gay marriage to gun control and immigration.
National-security and
foreign-policy questions have the power to divide but are no longer litmus tests. Even on economic issues, the party generally speaks with one voice:
in favor of universal healthcare, against reducing safety-net programs, for
progressive taxation and
government-driven economic stimulus. Neera Tanden, president of the Center for American Progress, told me in an email that the Democratic Party just doesn't get hung up on internecine battles these days. "
I believe that it's a big-tent party that can and should accommodate centrists and liberals," Tanden said. "
That ideological purity has not been a winning strategy for the other side."
The divide isn't so much about issues as tone and tactics. The Warrenites (
Elizabeth Warren loyalists) harp on the gap between rich and poor and inveigh against big business; the centrists assure their big corporate donors that Democrats can be business-friendly.
The comparison to
Republicans is inevitable and instructive. No one seriously doubts anymore that the
GOP is badly divided, with
a right-wing faction that has virtually declared war on
the more moderate establishment. But few of the party's politicians disagree on social or cultural issues (
immigration is a notable exception), and the view that taxes should be lower and government smaller is virtually unanimous. What the
Ted Cruz faction and
the John Boehner faction disagree on is whether the party's rhetoric ought to be conciliatory or scorched-earth, and how far to go—shutting down the government? refusing to raise the debt ceiling?—in pursuit of agreed-upon goals like getting rid of
Obamacare. The GOP's divide, like
the Democrats', is more about tone than about issues.
Sources: www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/02/no-liberals-dont-control-the-democratic-party/283653/Progressive wing Democratic PartyToday
progressive Democrats are generally regarded as
social progressives on
social issues. On economic issues,
progressive Democrats generally promote
Keynesian economics or
a mixed economic system.
The Congressional Progressive Caucus (
CPC) is
a caucus of progressive House Democrats, along with one independent in the Senate, in the U.S. Congress. It is the single largest Democratic caucus in the House of Representatives. Its members have included Congressmen
Dennis Kucinich (OH),
Alan Grayson (FL),
John Conyers (MI),
Barbara Lee (CA),
Jim McDermott (WA), and
John Lewis (GA).
Dennis KucinichAlan GraysonBarbara LeeJim McDermottJohn LewisMany
progressive Democrats are
ideological descendants of
the New Left of Democratic Presidential candidate/Senator
George McGovern of South Dakota; others were involved in the presidential candidacies of Vermont Governor
Howard Dean and U.S. Rep.
Dennis Kucinich of Ohio, and still others are disaffected former members of
the Green Party. This group consists disproportionately of college-educated professionals.[29] A recent study by the Pew Research Center found that a plurality, 41%, resided in mass affluent households and 49% were college graduates.
Howard DeanProgressive Democratic candidates for public office have had popular support as candidates in metropolitan areas outside the South, and among
African-Americans nationwide. Senators Paul Wellstone (MN), Elizabeth Warren (MA), and Sherrod Brown (OH) have been described as progressive. Other famous progressives include Henry A. Wallace, Eugene McCarthy and Ted Kennedy.
Sherrod BrownEugene McCarthyTed KennedyThe 2016 Democratic Party presidential primaries and caucuses between
Hillary Clinton and
Bernie Sanders was largely a fight along ideological lines between the two.
Hillary Clinton who referred to herself as a "
progressive who gets things done", received substantial support from
African Americans, older Americans, women, LGBT Americans, Muslim Americans, Latino Americans, and Jewish Americans; while
Sanders, a member of
the Congressional Progressive Caucus, received an overwhelming majority of support from
millennials across the board. During the general election,
Clinton campaigned to appeal to moderate Republicans,
due to their rejection of the Republican candidate Donald Trump, backed by
the ultra-conservative Alt-Right movement. During the primaries,
Sanders ran
further to the left of Clinton, causing her
to move slightly left during the presidential primaries and caucuses, coming out against the Keystone Pipeline and Trans-Pacific Partnership along with coming out in favor of a $15 federal minimum wage. One key area that
Clinton ran to
the left of
Sanders on was gun control, with Clinton having a staunchly pro-gun control voting record in Congress while
Sanders has been in favor of gun control but has not always voted for pro-gun control positions. During the drafting of the
2016 Democratic Party platform,
Clinton's and
DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz's committee appointees to the
platform drafting committee all voted against language opposing the Trans-Pacific Partnership while
Sanders' committee appointees voted in favor of it, casting doubt on
Clinton's opposition to the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Still,
Sanders stated repeatedly that the campaigns worked together to put forward the most progressive platform in party history.