|
|
Post by bescheid on Nov 7, 2007 10:54:00 GMT -7
Just for information to forward rather it to be useless or interesting.
Received this previous evening from on of the office supervisors. Beginst for today {USA} unless removed from the call list, will be given access to advertising people, all telephone calls will be charged to the individual cell telephone number.
Unless removed by use of number# 888-382-1222
For removal of mailing list, the office of post, will provide a suitable form for this purpose.
On the national do not call regestry, there is a confirmation url, it will need your telephone number with also your e-mail address. It will automatic confirm with a return to you as rather your number is still good on the national-no-call-list.
Charles
|
|
Mary
Cosmopolitan
Posts: 934
|
Post by Mary on Nov 7, 2007 11:24:36 GMT -7
Heres the link to go to the Federal Trade Commissions website to register on the NATIONAL do not call list. www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/alerts/alt107.shtmIt should take you first to the page that will answer all your questions. Including the fact that they will no longer remove number in 5 yrs. there is no expiration unless you call and request it. Mary |
|
|
|
Post by leslie on Nov 7, 2007 13:26:04 GMT -7
Charles I think you have got it wrong. What I read into his statement (which I have to say he was joking -I hope!) is that because we are liars and cheats we wouldn't get as far as running for office! Come on Bob - what did you really mean?!   ;D Leslie |
|
Bob S
European
Rainbow Bear
Posts: 2,052
|
Post by Bob S on Nov 7, 2007 21:42:36 GMT -7
;D Thank you Charles, that is exactly what I was saying. The people in this forum are too good to be politicians. ;D ;D  |
|
Bob S
European
Rainbow Bear
Posts: 2,052
|
Post by Bob S on Nov 7, 2007 21:47:07 GMT -7
;D muskets have more than 2 moving parts, a sword has none.  mmmmmmm in order to have any effect at all, the sword has to have one moving part, no??  Kai The sword alone has no moving parts. The person who wields the sword ads an arm and wrist. The sword alone has no moving parts. |
|
|
|
Post by kaima on Nov 7, 2007 23:32:33 GMT -7
The sword alone has no moving parts. The person who wields the sword ads an arm and wrist. The sword alone has no moving parts. I would argue that either the sword has to be moving or the victim of the sword must be moving for it to be effective. Thus, although the movement is relative, I say the sword is - one - moving part. Kai using Relativistic Physics ... ;D |
|
Bob S
European
Rainbow Bear
Posts: 2,052
|
Post by Bob S on Nov 7, 2007 23:42:10 GMT -7
The sword alone has no moving parts. The person who wields the sword ads an arm and wrist. The sword alone has no moving parts. I would argue that either the sword has to be moving or the victim of the sword must be moving for it to be effective. Thus, although the movement is relative, I say the sword is - one - moving part. Kai using Relativistic Physics ... ;D Kai. I was only trying to make a funny. ;D ;D |
|
;D
