|
|
Post by Nictoshek on Jun 29, 2014 13:30:45 GMT -7
|
|
|
|
Post by kaima on Jun 30, 2014 0:31:02 GMT -7
Jumping back to memories of the Civil Rights movement and people wondering why the blacks were making such a show ... Jump forward and imagine a world where gays are not demonstrating, but just moving about their daily business, perfectly as unremarkable as blacks do today - and coud not do 40 years ago.
Let us look forward to the mundane, the unremarkable.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nictoshek on Jun 30, 2014 2:47:17 GMT -7
|
|
|
|
Post by kaima on Jun 30, 2014 3:36:14 GMT -7
If you truely mean that is the ONLY thing, then it is long in the past and is no longer relevant. Or is there something else that bothers you? I am sure that if you looked deep enough you would find some seedy aspects to the start of the Civil Rights movement, aand certainly the movements to gain rights for the uneducated, filhy peasants in Europe when they tried to gainrights from their robber baron lords. Then those filthy immigrants had nerve to bring their unwashed bodis to America and poison the clean natives who never had to work up resistaance against the filth our ancestors wallowed in for cnturies. You can take all of the nasty things said of the US immigrants today and apply the worst of the comments to our immigrant grandparents.. uneducated, unwashed, uncivilized with barbaric tongues, and definitely a threat to the theoretical Anglo culture that ran America. The gays aren't much of a part of my life, blacs aren't and you aren't. So I really don't care if you choose or were born to lead your life as I lead mine of not. Does something really bother you about the gays? |
|
|
|
Post by Nictoshek on Jun 30, 2014 7:17:15 GMT -7
Google, Facebook,Yahoo, etc., would agree with you,as dwelling on the past would disrupt the user's experience. Besides, these company behemoths wish at all costs, to preserve and protect their fortress walls against outside intrusions... that could truly liberate the human soul.
Why We Need Jacques Ellul Today |
|
|
|
Post by pieter on Jun 30, 2014 14:07:26 GMT -7
Maybe gays were a rich group, because Gay men and Gay couples often don't have children and can spend their money on house interiors and going out more. The mafia could earn something by blackmailing them and to put pressure on some closet gays. I wasn't aware of the mafia involvement in Gay bars. But in the same time I think the mafia could earning from Racketeering, extortion and control over straight bars, brothels and strip clubs (night clubs). Gays are a minority and straight people (hetrosexuals) go to bars, restaurants and night clubs too. So I don't know what is more profitable.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nictoshek on Jul 3, 2014 15:30:50 GMT -7
Another convenience by jettisoning the past, is that most people nowadays, can forget about the true origins of the so called 'AIDS' pandemic. Namely the fact, that is was facilitated by street hustlers and male prostitutes back in the late 70s. An ancient unglamorous infamous pathogen was masked and mutated with the help of corporate pharmaceuticals....and their coffer laden state sponsors.
|
|
|
|
Post by karl on Jul 3, 2014 16:13:35 GMT -7
Perhaps to speak not against gays nor for them, it is an individual decision upon their part. In light of their particular situation, most do not wish for any problems or issues in respect to their employment standing. It is then in the light of their situation, gays for the most part, are very excellent employees.
The problem we had/have, is the possible situation of compromise by black mail if to hire any of these people. They become a security risk even upon the entry into our lobby. Whilst on the other side of the roman coin, if a person of suitable qualities that are in short supply, yes of course they do have the opportunity of entry, if they survive the various checks and schooling.
In past, my self had described the loss of our office pet mouse under the foot of a very attractive young lady. She had all the qualifications required to fit in the particular work she applied for. And, with this, I must say a very deadly lady for she was a sleeper black widow with a very nasty sting and no idea of conscience.
Karl
|
|
