Youtube Shooting Suspect video

[Jaga]

It is an interesting and out of the box story....since the shooter was a woman, who was of Persian origin and had some legitimate grievances against Youtube and was a vegan.

She had strong views, strong opinions and went too far. Still, it is worth to notice her story:

www.mediaite.com/online/youtube-shooter-identified-as-nasim-aghdam/

he woman suspected of opening fire inside YouTube’s headquarters near San Fransisco, California on Tuesday, wounding at least three people before fatally shooting herself, has been identified as 39-year-old Nasim Najafi Aghdam:



Aghdam was armed with a handgun when she walked into the YouTube offices in San Bruno and opened fire, causing a panic. She shot three people before taking her own life by shooting herself in the head.

Aghdam, a resident of Southern California, appears to have a prolific presence on YouTube, NBC confirmed.

In a harrowing video posted in January 2017 — which you can watch above — she claims YouTube “discriminated and filtered” her videos.

Aghdam’s video links to a website, Nasimesabz.com, on which she rails against YouTube for restricting her videos. “Youtube filtered my channels to keep them from getting views!” one post on the website reads.

[karl]

Jaga

We received this news also and not only suprising {meaning another mass shooting incident in the States}. It only demonstrates the nuts come in various sizes and sexes with both very dangerous.

Karl

[Jaga]

Karl,

i still think we should differentiate nuts to know not only their internal motives but when they come from, what are their grievances, how they got the guns etc....

[karl]

Apr 4, 2018 17:48:54 GMT -7 Jaga said:

Karl,

i still think we should differentiate nuts to know not only their internal motives but when they come from, what are their grievances, how they got the guns etc....

Jaga

Yes, once to re-read my reply, was to find as you have very simplistic. Yes, as you have pointed out,to know and understand their internal motives as of this young lady we speak of, where they come from and their grievances,and of course, how they got their guns.

You, my self and our member friends,are educated people with varying university degrees in our respective fields of endeavor but non the less, trained how to learn and use the tools of our education for which ever endeavor we may embark upon. This includes the manner of both written in proper language as expected by our station in life. For this is what is expected of us as should be, there fore, I have provided an answer to your reply, as follows:


Let us begin at the top: The United States is a Nation awash in firearms. Criminals have them, Police have them, Law abiding citizens have them, the problem with guns is just too big to solve in self.

For as the ease of obtaining a gun, even for a foreigner, is not that difficult, it just takes more money to pay for the risk or for that matter, to conduct a private purchase from an individual. This was realized whilst conducting my work in the Seattle/Portland area.

In the manner of mindset? Yes, to say mental illness is a cause, but we must agree, you and my self, that this is a very broad term to use to explain a mass shooting. For example: Depression is completely different from anxiety, which is completely different from bipolar disorder, which is completely different again from having psychotic tendencies. With this, would a single bout of depression qualify as mental illness?

Perhaps it would be better to label or say: The failure in control of such things as strong grievances/poor impulse control/being unable to manage personal feelings,frustrations and anger in a healthy manner. For these are the prime reasons of most acts of aggression. But then, aggression is actually a very complicated association with personal experience, education, mindset and attitude. With this, aggression is any behavour that is intended to harm some one else, but differs from violence which is only physical and extreme such that is successful in causing severe bodily damage or death to another person{s}.

There though, is a primary obstacle built in with the American system that is a fact.

The United States as a nation, has always been a nation that values the individual and their wants and needs over the collective. In such an environment, initiating laws that remove rights from a significant amount of people even when they make every one safer, simply will not work.

Yes, the Americans do have a problem, it is their problem and not ours.

Karl