Mary
Cosmopolitan
Posts: 934
|
Post by Mary on Jan 9, 2008 10:47:17 GMT -7
WARSAW, Poland - A Polish man got the shock of his life when he visited a brothel and spotted his wife among the establishment's employees.
Polish tabloid Super Express said the woman had been making some extra money on the side while telling her husband she worked at a store in a nearby town.
"I was dumbfounded. I thought I was dreaming," the husband told the newspaper on Wednesday.
The couple, married for 14 years, are now divorcing, the newspaper reported.
Copyright 2008 Reuters.
|
|
|
|
Post by leslie on Jan 9, 2008 11:26:13 GMT -7
An interesting point. Who is divorcing whom? Or can you just have a mutual divorce on the grounds that both parties were 'misbehaving'? There is usually one of the pair divorces the other for causing breakdown of the marriage - in this case, who was the 'causer'?
Leslie
|
|
Mary
Cosmopolitan
Posts: 934
|
Post by Mary on Jan 9, 2008 11:46:16 GMT -7
That's all there was to the article. Maybe someone else can find more info on it.
I can just hear the argument now...She's pi$$ed at him because he was visiting the brothel. He's pi$$ed at her for working there.
She could argue she was bringing in a nice paycheck, and he was spending it........
He says, he had to go to a brothel, she was always too tired after a days work......
I wouldn't want to be either of their lawyers!
Mary
|
|
|
|
Post by bescheid on Jan 9, 2008 12:51:15 GMT -7
Hmmm, ok
For every situation, there will lay an opportunity, we must think out side the box...
The establishment, are they properly licensed? Have they on view, the license for business?
The health card of each lady, this must be displayed for inspection.
The lady in question: Has she her identification for examination at demand?
The lady in question, has she her currant registration available for examination upon demand?
If above at this point, is lacking, then the establishment must be closed down upon immediate appointed time being as present.
All employees of said establishment must be placed as arrested with proper transportation provided in and upon closed transport for immediate transport to detention. For identification, charges placed upon said individual person. Then detained for judicial disposition.
The man, will be placed upon immediate arrest and transport for detention, for Identification and Judaical disposition.
For all, this is a public offense as a victomless crime. As so such, is to be public information with out violation of personal privacy, to be placed as public information publication {front page news}.
Ok, we charge as public offense to the man: for the act of entrance into a common placed of Establishment. The crime of {solicitation for act of sexual gratification}.
The woman: Charge: solicitation of sexual gratification with sexual act for charge.
All, need be placed into public view, in common place of public out door attendance. To be placed locked as in stocks by neck, for time period to be of 14 hours whilst of day light hours between that of {06.00} to not exceed day light time of 18.00}.
Or
Be exhibited to of public flogging to not exceed that of 30 hard hand lashes of 9 tails of flog. Which of not less then that of 40 soft hand lashes entailed by strong hand.
Charles
|
|
Mary
Cosmopolitan
Posts: 934
|
Post by Mary on Jan 9, 2008 13:06:37 GMT -7
Hmmm, ok For every situation, there will lay an opportunity, we must think out side the box... The establishment, are they properly licensed? Have they on view, the license for business? The health card of each lady, this must be displayed for inspection. The lady in question: Has she her identification for examination at demand? The lady in question, has she her currant registration available for examination upon demand? If above at this point, is lacking, then the establishment must be closed down upon immediate appointed time being as present. All employees of said establishment must be placed as arrested with proper transportation provided in and upon closed transport for immediate transport to detention. For identification, charges placed upon said individual person. Then detained for judicial disposition. The man, will be placed upon immediate arrest and transport for detention, for Identification and Judaical disposition. For all, this is a public offense as a victomless crime. As so such, is to be public information with out violation of personal privacy, to be placed as public information publication {front page news}. Ok, we charge as public offense to the man: for the act of entrance into a common placed of Establishment. The crime of {solicitation for act of sexual gratification}. The woman: Charge: solicitation of sexual gratification with sexual act for charge. All, need be placed into public view, in common place of public out door attendance. To be placed locked as in stocks by neck, for time period to be of 14 hours whilst of day light hours between that of {06.00} to not exceed day light time of 18.00}. Or Be exhibited to of public flogging to not exceed that of 30 hard hand lashes of 9 tails of flog. Which of not less then that of 40 soft hand lashes entailed by strong hand. Charles Geezzz Charles, You're tough on crime! If I were the judge I'd lock them in a cell together and see who the survivor is. (just kidding) I hope they don't have kids, now that would be devistating and so embarassing for children or any other family members. Mary |
|
|
|
Post by bescheid on Jan 9, 2008 13:28:05 GMT -7
mary
Am I such a monster? For I mean not to appear as such. It is that the union of a man and wife, is so much an sacred act in the eyes of the church.
Or am I assuming overly too much? For in the act of marriage as with the individual profession of parties involved. That each would upon as professed. Be to the responsibility of one to the other as, be as one?
Or am I mis-informed? Or am I just simply just too stupid to figure?
For this, I simply wish, that I had never left the see. For there it was just the ship and then the crew. For our life was our ship and our mother the see.
Charles
|
|
|
|
Post by valpomike on Jan 9, 2008 13:47:48 GMT -7
Mary,
Who is wrong in this case, neither are doing the correct thing. There was a story like this, many years ago, that something like this happened, with a man and his daughter.
Michael Dabrowski
|
|
Mary
Cosmopolitan
Posts: 934
|
Post by Mary on Jan 9, 2008 15:55:28 GMT -7
Charles,
I was just kidding, no you're not a monster...at least as far as I can tell!
Mary
|
|
|
|
Post by bescheid on Jan 9, 2008 16:49:03 GMT -7
Charles, I was just kidding, no you're not a monster...at least as far as I can tell! Mary Mary You are indeed a dear heart: For neither of us are monsters, it is just my loused attempt at humour, and my attempts are simply deplorable. Sorry.. Also to thank you for your reply, for I was to recheck of my post and discovered my lack of use of the spell check feature, simply for got. Boy, what a louse I am in spelling. Charles |
|
|
|
Post by valpomike on Jan 9, 2008 17:35:18 GMT -7
To all,
When this happens, do you get your money back? Or can you get another lady?
Michael Dabrowski
|
|
Pawian
European
Have you seen my frog?
Posts: 3,266
|
Post by Pawian on Jan 10, 2008 12:23:15 GMT -7
If he went to a brothel, it means he is bored with his wife.....
If she decided to work in such a place, it means she is bored with her husband.
Divorce is a mutual agreement in such a case.... Their meeting in the brothel helped them realise there is no sense in prolonging their farsical marriage ....
|
|
Pawian
European
Have you seen my frog?
Posts: 3,266
|
Post by Pawian on Jan 10, 2008 12:24:33 GMT -7
"I was dumbfounded. I thought I was dreaming," the husband told the newspaper on Wednesday. Copyright 2008 Reuters. What a moron! What was he doing there himself??? Delievering pizza?  |
|
|
|
Post by valpomike on Jan 10, 2008 15:26:04 GMT -7
SO WHO IS WRONG?
|
|
