Mary,
I think it is important. McCain has positioned himself as an expert on foreign policy and the most knowledgeable candidate on international relations. So when he comes off in this way it gives one pause. In addition I think the tag line on this thread is a little odd.
This is from Foreign Policy Blog (lots of interesting stuff there)
blog.foreignpolicy.com/node/9824if you follow the link you can listen to the interview yourself to see if you agree with the the analysis offered.
Listening to the original English audio of John McCain's already infamous interview with Radio Caracol Miami, it's fairly obvious that McCain doesn't intend to describe Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero of Spain as one of America's enemies, he just has no idea what the interviewer is talking about:
Interviewer: Let's talk about Spain. If you are elected president, would you be willing to invite President José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero to the White House to meet with you?
McCain: I would be willing to meet with those leaders who are our friends and want to work with us in a cooperative fashion. And by the way, President Calderon of Mexico is fighting a very tough fight against the drug cartels. I'm glad we are now working in cooperation with the Mexican government on the Merida plan and I intend to move forward with relations and invite as many of them as I can, of those leaders to the White House.
Interviewer: Would that invitation be extended to the Zapatero government, to the president itself?
McCain: I don't...you know, honestly I have to look at the relations and the situations and the priorities but I can assure you, I will establish closer relations with our friends and I will stand up to those who want to do harm to the United States of America. I know how to do both.
Interviewer: So you have to see if he's willing to meet with you, or you'll be able to do it in the White House?
McCain: Again, I don't...all I can tell you is that I have a clear record of working with leaders in the hemisphere that are friends with us and standing up to those who are not and that's judged on basis of the importance of our relationship with Latin America and the entire region.
Interviewer: Okay, but what about Europe? I'm talking about the president of Spain.
McCain: What about me, what?
Interviewer: Are you willing to meet with him if you are elected president?
McCain: I'm willing to meet with any leader that's dedicated to the same principles and philosophy that we are for human rights, democracy, and freedom and I will stand up to those that do not.
The interviewer has an accent and speaks somewhat quickly, so it's possible that the Arizona senator didn't really understand the questions and was just trying to wing it. It also seems like the name Zapatero didn't really ring a bell for him (perhaps he was thinking of Mexico's Zapatista rebels?), which is unfortunate given that earlier in the interview, he distinguishes himself from Barack Obama by saying, "I know the issues and I know the leaders."
Any way you interpret this gaffe, it doesn't look good for McCain. If he honestly considers Zapatero to be in the same category as Chávez and Morales -- which I doubt -- he looks overly hawkish. And if he didn't know who the prime minister of Spain is, it undercuts his credibility as a foreign-policy expert. If he was just having a "senior moment" and didn't understand what he was being asked, well, that might be the worst.Listening to the original English audio of John McCain's already infamous interview with Radio Caracol Miami, it's fairly obvious that McCain doesn't intend to describe Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero of Spain as one of America's enemies, he just has no idea what the interviewer is talking about:
Interviewer: Let's talk about Spain. If you are elected president, would you be willing to invite President José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero to the White House to meet with you?
McCain: I would be willing to meet with those leaders who are our friends and want to work with us in a cooperative fashion. And by the way, President Calderon of Mexico is fighting a very tough fight against the drug cartels. I'm glad we are now working in cooperation with the Mexican government on the Merida plan and I intend to move forward with relations and invite as many of them as I can, of those leaders to the White House.
Interviewer: Would that invitation be extended to the Zapatero government, to the president itself?
McCain: I don't...you know, honestly I have to look at the relations and the situations and the priorities but I can assure you, I will establish closer relations with our friends and I will stand up to those who want to do harm to the United States of America. I know how to do both.
Interviewer: So you have to see if he's willing to meet with you, or you'll be able to do it in the White House?
McCain: Again, I don't...all I can tell you is that I have a clear record of working with leaders in the hemisphere that are friends with us and standing up to those who are not and that's judged on basis of the importance of our relationship with Latin America and the entire region.
Interviewer: Okay, but what about Europe? I'm talking about the president of Spain.
McCain: What about me, what?
Interviewer: Are you willing to meet with him if you are elected president?
McCain: I'm willing to meet with any leader that's dedicated to the same principles and philosophy that we are for human rights, democracy, and freedom and I will stand up to those that do not.
The interviewer has an accent and speaks somewhat quickly, so it's possible that the Arizona senator didn't really understand the questions and was just trying to wing it. It also seems like the name Zapatero didn't really ring a bell for him (perhaps he was thinking of Mexico's Zapatista rebels?), which is unfortunate given that earlier in the interview, he distinguishes himself from Barack Obama by saying, "I know the issues and I know the leaders."
Any way you interpret this gaffe, it doesn't look good for McCain. If he honestly considers Zapatero to be in the same category as Chávez and Morales -- which I doubt -- he looks overly hawkish. And if he didn't know who the prime minister of Spain is, it undercuts his credibility as a foreign-policy expert. If he was just having a "senior moment" and didn't understand what he was being asked, well, that might be the worst.
, Why?
