|
Post by Nictoshek on Nov 18, 2010 17:16:50 GMT -7
|
|
|
Post by kaima on Nov 18, 2010 23:32:35 GMT -7
This is too tempting to pass by ... and evidently I am not the only one (no surprise!) who thought of silicon boobs or fake boobs as a danger ... so combining this topic with Ukraine Topless Women's Rights Group topic, Just to prove it can be bi- or uni- or a- or neutral- sexual topic, we are talking about actually more titillating is the story of What happened when I took my new boobs through airport security...got "felt up" True story, now that I'm recovered a bit and not so angry... I'll share So, I traveled for my breast augmentation and was a little worried about trying to get through security at the airport on my way home since my doc said I would have drains and pain pump. Well, ended up not needing drains, and doc took out my pain pump on the day I left, so didn't have to worry about that. GET THIS. On my way through security at my stop-over to get on my second flight, they pick me at random to get body scanned. Bad luck, since the guy said they only pick maybe 1/20 people or something. Anyways, obviously the implants showed up on the x-ray, and they were all suspicious. I told them I just had surgery and had to explain "what kind" to these dumbos as everyone stared (although I was kinda doped up on pain meds too much to care). So then this airport security lady has to take me to a private room, where a second security lady had to be present, and feel my boobs!!! So she puts her hand up under my shirt to the bottom of my boobs and feels to make sure that I did, indeed, have ... boobs. Then she was all curious, asking me questions about my implants, and did it hurt, yadda yadda. She was actually not judgmental at all, which was kind of cool. Doesn't mean I enjoyed having her grubby hands all over my private area, though. I felt like her in retaliation but didn't have the upper arm strength at that time, seeing as I'd had implants shoved under my chest muscle a few days prior LOL. So, I find myself torn at being really bleeping pissed off at the whole situation and viewing it as a bit amusing. But now I'm going to seriously be on edge every time I go through security, if i end up having to do the body scanner. I have heard of so many people whose implants aren't a problem even though they show up on the scanner. Wth!!! Well, thought I'd share. Hope it only happens to me and no one else in the future! * * * I wonder what the scanners show with C4 implants ....
|
|
|
Post by Nictoshek on Nov 19, 2010 2:33:18 GMT -7
NAPOLITANO: THE BALL’S IN MY COURT NOW
by Ann Coulter November 17, 2010
After the 9/11 attacks, when 19 Muslim terrorists -- 15 from Saudi Arabia, two from the United Arab Emirates and one each from Egypt and Lebanon, 14 with "al" in their names -- took over commercial aircraft with box-cutters, the government banned sharp objects from planes.
Airport security began confiscating little old ladies' knitting needles and breaking the mouse-sized nail files off of passengers' nail clippers. Surprisingly, no decrease in the number of hijacking attempts by little old ladies and manicurists was noted.
After another Muslim terrorist, Richard Reid, AKA Tariq Raja, AKA Abdel Rahim, AKA Abdul Raheem, AKA Abu Ibrahim, AKA Sammy Cohen (which was only his eHarmony alias), tried to blow up a commercial aircraft with explosive-laden sneakers, the government prohibited more than 3 ounces of liquid from being carried on airplanes.
All passengers were required to take off their shoes for special security screening, which did not thwart a single terrorist attack, but made airport security checkpoints a lot smellier.
After Muslim terrorist Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab of Nigeria tried to detonate explosive material in his underwear over Detroit last Christmas, the government began requiring nude body scans at airports.
The machines, which cannot detect chemicals or plastic, would not have caught the diaper bomber. So, again, no hijackers were stopped, but being able to see passengers in the nude boosted the morale of airport security personnel by 22 percent.
After explosives were inserted in two ink cartridges and placed on a plane headed to the United States from the Muslim nation of Yemen, the government banned printer cartridges from all domestic flights, resulting in no improvement in airport security, while requiring ink cartridges who traveled to take Amtrak.
So when the next Muslim terrorist, probably named Abdul Ahmed al Shehri, places explosives in his anal cavity, what is the government going to require then? (If you're looking for a good investment opportunity, might I suggest rubber gloves?)
Last year, a Muslim attempting to murder Prince Mohammed bin Nayef of Saudi Arabia blew himself up with a bomb stuck up his anus. Fortunately, this didn't happen near an airport, or Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano would now be requiring full body cavity searches to fly.
You can't stop a terrorist attack by searching for the explosives any more than you can stop crime by taking away everyone's guns.
In the 1970s, liberal ideas on crime swept the country. Gun owners were treated like criminals while actual criminals were coddled and released. If only we treated criminals with dignity and respect and showed them the system was fair, liberals told us, criminals would reward us with good behavior.
As is now well known, crime exploded in the '70s. It took decades of conservative law-and-order policies to get crime back to near-1950s levels.
It's similarly pointless to treat all Americans as if they're potential terrorists while trying to find and confiscate anything that could be used as a weapon. We can't search all passengers for explosives because Muslims stick explosives up their anuses. (Talk about jobs Americans just won't do.)
You have to search for the terrorists.
Fortunately, that's the one advantage we have in this war. In a lucky stroke, all the terrorists are swarthy, foreign-born, Muslim males. (Think: "Guys Madonna would date.")
This would give us a major leg up -- if only the country weren't insane.
Is there any question that we'd be looking for Swedes if the 9/11 terrorists, the shoe bomber, the diaper bomber and the printer cartridge bomber had all been Swedish? If the Irish Republican Army were bombing our planes, wouldn't we be looking for people with Irish surnames and an Irish appearance?
Only because the terrorists are Muslims do we pretend not to notice who keeps trying to blow up our planes.
It would be harder to find Swedes or Irish boarding commercial airliners in the U.S. than Muslims. Swarthy foreigners stand out like a sore thumb in an airport. The American domestic flying population is remarkably homogenous. An airport is not a Sears department store.
Only about a third of all Americans flew even once in the last year, and only 7 percent took more than four round trips. The majority of airline passengers are middle-aged, middle-class, white businessmen with about a million frequent flier miles. I'd wager that more than 90 percent of domestic air travelers were born in the U.S.
If the government did nothing more than have a five-minute conversation with the one passenger per flight born outside the U.S., you'd need 90 percent fewer Transportation Security Administration agents and airlines would be far safer than they are now.
Instead, Napolitano just keeps ordering more invasive searches of all passengers, without exception -- except members of Congress and government officials, who get VIP treatment, so they never know what she's doing to the rest of us.
Two weeks ago, Napolitano ordered TSA agents to start groping women's breasts and all passengers' genitalia -- children, nuns and rape victims, everyone except government officials and members of Congress. (Which is weird because Dennis Kucinich would like it.)
"Please have your genitalia out and ready to be fondled when you approach the security checkpoint."
This is the punishment for refusing the nude body scan for passengers who don't want to appear nude on live video or are worried about the skin cancer risk of the machines -- risks acknowledged by the very Johns Hopkins study touted by the government.
It is becoming increasingly obvious that we need to keep the government as far away from airport security as possible, and not only because Janet Napolitano did her graduate work in North Korea.
|
|
|
Post by karl on Nov 19, 2010 4:29:50 GMT -7
Hmmm, the recent addition of Kai is becoming most interesting. I think perhaps I am in the wrong business and missing much opportunity in the field of {Groping}...
I am wondering: Is there a prior requirement to the science of Groping? If so, then a suggestion for attainment into this very interesting field of achievement. I am quite willing to attend any class or school for attainment of skill{s} requirement.
At present my credentials are a bit dated in experience in the field of groping, but am quite willing to up-date. In as much to physiological reactions, I must admit to an increase of blood pressure and redding of facial appearance.
I do trust this will not jeopardize my chance of opportunity of entrance into this new field of science...
At present, all and any positive suggestion is subject to the approval of my wife, it must be admitted this at present is not of viable possibility.
Karl
|
|
|
Post by Nictoshek on Nov 19, 2010 5:37:30 GMT -7
|
|
|
Post by karl on Nov 19, 2010 6:14:25 GMT -7
Gollies Nictoe And I was so excited with this new possible career as groper. To be beat out by that famous Gropenator is simply humiliating to say the least...Oh well, nothing risked, nothing gained... Opp, almost forgot this addition: I understand there are some changes in the works in revamping the TSA. Perhaps efferts such as that of yours is working In of the Isralie operations in this area, they use ex-military people very well trained in physilogical observation. It is problematical if those people are or would be available for service in the USA. But, it would make much better sense to use them in this stead of the civilian types now in service. For as also a by and by to say: In my travels, I have not the pleasure to have been gropped, quite very disappointing I must say the least.. Perhaps it is my apperance of a worn out school master wearing a hat of the thirties and travel quite very light. Karl
|
|
|
Post by Nictoshek on Nov 19, 2010 6:43:56 GMT -7
Have you been to Festung Amerika lately Karl ? You really don't know what your missing:
|
|
|
Post by karl on Nov 19, 2010 9:54:55 GMT -7
Have you been to Festung Amerika lately Karl ? You really don't know what your missing: Opps Nectoe Close to tabu for me of comment...Fortress is/was a term used in past to denote of an impossible or for the least, extremely difficult war time operation to be successful victory. It has been some time since to hear of this term, even with time elapse, it is still a valid term. There is a whispered phase we use in description that may be to your thoughts {What the people wish for, they will have}. Karl
|
|
|
Post by Nictoshek on Nov 20, 2010 18:12:01 GMT -7
The Attack on Human Dignity
by Rev. Emmanuel Charles McCarthy
November 20, 2010
The human being is made in the image and likeness of God. He or she has the Spark of the Divine "within" him or her. He or she is the primal and primary Temple of God on earth. Each person therefore deserves from the other and gives to the other not just respect, but reverence. The destruction of a fellow human — whether it be in mind, soul, body or spirit — is therefore the desecration of the Great Temple on earth, the place in time and space where the Living God chose foremost to reside.
The sublimity, dignity and transcendental value of each human being make it a grave violation of the Presence of God and of God-given human dignity to treat a person as a thing, a widget in some one's grand illusion, a means to be used, manipulated, abused, lied to, and/or crushed to serve another's agenda. Violate is derived from the same Latin word as violence, violare. To violate a reality is to do violence to that reality. To violate a reality is to treat it in a way that is not in accordance with its nature, e.g., to treat a sentient human being as if he or she were a non-sentient rock violates the reality of the human being. To treat a human being who is the living Temple of God on earth and who is infinitely loved and valued by this same God, as a tool, as a thing, as a person of no real significance beyond my utilitarian need for him or her in some grandiose plan I have concocted, rather than with the reverence, love and value that he or she intrinsically and forever possesses, as a son or daughter of my God and his or her God, of my Father and his or her Father, of the One God, is to violate him or her, to do violence to them. And, a violation of a person's intrinsic, God bestowed human dignity and transcendent value is evil regardless of how normalized it has become, how culturally acceptable it has become, how "holy" it has become or how legal it has become.
In most case most of the nefarious processes by which government does what it does are utterly hidden from the eyes of the public, who are only given a contrived packet of PR lies leading up to and after the fact of implementation. This is what is meant in the well-known line attributed to Bismarck — well known because everyone inherently recognizes its truth, even though most live in personal and communal denial of it — Laws, like sausages, cease to inspire respect in proportion as we know how they are made.
This brings us to Michael Chertoff, the guy who as an assistant DA rounded-up 1200 Arabs and others without legal warrant or cause immediately after September 11, who was co-author of the Patriot Act, who was then made a Federal Court of Appeals Judge, who soon after found legal flaws with the conviction of the six Mossad operatives known as "the Dancing Israelis," and therefore released them on bail, never to be seen again, who was then made the Head of Homeland Security, who almost immediately began hawking the idea of full body scanners at airports while Head of Homeland Security and who has never stopped hawking them to this day, because his company, The Chertoff Group, has as a big-time client one of the two largest manufacturer — $160,000,000 dollars through 2009 — of Full Body Scanners, Rapiscan, Inc. So now it is the law of the land that if you, your spouse, or your child wants to fly to your parent's home for Thanksgiving or Christmas, you must either summit to being irradiated and stripped searched by a scanner for others to observe or else be groped, including genital, breast and buttocks groping. Why? Airport security demands it! And as sure as the Lord made little green apples, it will only be a short time before government-building security will demand it, and then private building security will demand it, and bus station security will demand it, etc. What a bonanza of government money the future holds for the Chertoff Group. And, what a boondoggle!
The airport with the best and safest security in the world is generally considered to be Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv, Israel. One of the prime designers of Tel Aviv's security system was Rafi Sela. Last April he told the Canadian Parliament that the Full Body Scanners are useless for security purposes and that is the reason there are none and never have been any at Ben Gurion Airport. He told the Parliament that they were a waste of money and that someone who understood Full Body Scanners could pass through them with enough explosives to blow up a Boeing 747 (The Vancouver Sun, April 23, 2010). So much for Michael Chertoff's years of hustling the Full Body Scanners with what he had to know from Israeli security experts were lies about their security value.
Finally, look at what Michael Chertoff and whoever he is an operative for have put into place as law. And then ask yourself, of what is the following short video a carbon copy?
Whoever has the power to spit on the dignity of a human being and does it, by shaming and humiliating him or her, by treating him or her as a disposable or inconvenient thing who can be violated to keep the plan rolling along or to keep the pay check coming in, poisons his or her own life, the life of the other and the life of the society. Demeaning the human dignity of another human being is sadism, Satanism and psychopathic, regardless from where in the chain of its execution one participates in it.
|
|
|
Post by Nictoshek on Nov 21, 2010 4:50:09 GMT -7
Jesse said he will no longer be forced by the TSA to prove he is not a criminal or terrorist. Breaking: Former Gov. Ventura Will No Longer Fly Due to Abuse He’s Endured at Hands of TSAPosted By kurtnimmoadmin On November 19, 2010 Kurt Nimmo Infowars.com November 19, 2010 Appearing on the Alex Jones Show today, the former governor of Minnesota and host of the popular TruTV show, Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura, announced he will no longer use commercial airlines due to the egregious abuses of the TSA and the government. Ventura said he made the decision to avoid public aircraft after he found himself becoming too comfortable with being routinely searched. He said he was subjected to pat down and search three or four times a week when he traveled for his television show. Ventura had hip surgery and the metal in his body invariably sets off airport metal detectors. Jesse said he will no longer be forced by the TSA to prove he is not a criminal or terrorist. He refuses to be considered guilty until proven innocent by the government in violation of the Fourth Amendment. He also admitted the decision not to fly may put an end to his career. Excerpted Quotes from Jesse Ventura’s Radio Statement “I feel that as a former governor, a former mayor, an honestly discharged [Vietnam] Navy veteran, that I can’t live with myself and subject myself that every time I go to an airport I have to prove that I am not a murderer, I have to prove I am not guilty of anything, I have to prove I won’t hijack a plane. I find it ridiculous and so for my own personal choice I will not fly a commercial airliner or subject myself to that again.” “It probably means an end to my career.” “I wish no ill will on my country. I am a patriot to my country. And yet I am subjected and treated like I might hijack a plane or I might blow up and murder people. And I take offense to that, Alex.” You’re also being x-rayed… Now if you’re flying four times a week, I don’t care how much they tell you how little radiation you’re getting. You start multiplying that out four, five, six times a week, 52 weeks out of the year maybe, then in five years from now I get some brain tumor and everyone is going to say ‘Gee, how did that happen?’ … So I don’t want to go in those things [naked body scanners].” “I think you’re exactly right, Alex. I think they are doing this to prepare us.” “In a free society, I was getting too comfortable being searched… I finally said I can’t do this anymore and keep my sanity. I believe in freedom and I believe nobody has the right to search you for any reason in our country unless they have probable cause that you’ve committed a crime and they’ve got a warrant.” After the Department of Homeland Security announced the TSA will conduct “enhanced” pat downs of people opting out of naked body scanners following the toner non-bombing fiasco earlier in the month, the Drudge Report teamed up with Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com to cover exploding public resistance to the new effort by the government to normalize the populace to ever-increasing police state tactics. Resistance to airport Gestapo zones gained critical momentum after pilots and flight attendants opposed searches and threatened to sue the government. “Nationwide outrage against the TSA is not only bringing to light new cases of airport abuse, it’s throwing fresh attention on previous incidents that have been going on for years,” Paul Joseph Watson wrote on Thursday. Several people have initiated lawsuits against the government, including a 21-year-old college student from Amarillo, Texas, who had her breasts exposed by a TSA goon and a businessman and frequent traveler who is infuriated by TSA workers sexually groping passengers, squeezing breasts and genitals, that he has filed a lawsuit in federal court in Miami requesting an injunction against the TSA to prevent them from touching private areas without reasonable suspicion.
|
|
|
Post by karl on Nov 21, 2010 9:54:59 GMT -7
The news here in Mexico is surprisingly very good and accurate in as well of the infrastructure in communications and travel. For a 3rd world country, it appears to be first rate in modern conveniences {In the cities}. The information as provided here as followed by my self, is very much in-tune with that of the Mexican news print. In as for security protection for the American public rather it be airtravel or what ever public transport. Becomes a question that needs be addressed by public sentiment.. What price are they {American Public} willing to pay for their safety? If they pay less, they face more risk, if they pay more, they face less risk. As with insurance, you get what you pay for.. Very recent, the most of us {my self included} were to attend a meeting provided by representatives of the Federal Police. The consensus of the meeting agenda was safety and risk. It appeared very quickly of some attention provided to their office of some individuals {my self included} of early morning health walks unescorted. Appears our activities were observed and recorded {photographs with dates and locations} transfered to their office with activity reports from representatives of the paid security people of this area. Yes, my face was represented amongst some presented photos {it seems my sins return for my earlier photography}. The meeting {meetings} were for most part of the day for as to include all of our office personnel for attendance. Once conclusion of the meeting, signed attendance with understanding of penalty if violated. It was very understood by our selves of the situation of self protection the Federal Police representatives were building for them selves in the situation one or more of us were to be injured or worse whilst on their watch. Freedoms? I wonder. It is the price we pay for our lives and wellbeing in this time and age... The following is an excellent example of material covered and signed off on in the attendance of the meeting. tiny.cc/8id6wKarl
|
|
|
Post by Nictoshek on Nov 21, 2010 11:53:14 GMT -7
Thanks for the link Karl....and you stay safe.
|
|
|
Post by Nictoshek on Nov 21, 2010 13:28:55 GMT -7
You SEE folks what we are dealing with here in Chicago this holiday season:
|
|
|
Post by karl on Nov 21, 2010 19:37:55 GMT -7
What a deplorable mess!! I think perhaps though, a strong wind is becoming a storm quite very quickly in shot time quick. It appears Mr. John Pistol is to be the star guest to some hearings. Even though Miss Janet Napolitano is supporting him, it would appear even her skirts are soon to be catching some soil. thehill.com/homenews/administration/129313-tsa-head-in-for-grilling-on-security-measuresUpon provided an opportunity, it is expected the recipient shall carry out that opportunity in the best most appropriate manner in substance as to be a natural acceptance by the public. Mr. Pistol it would so seem, has failed his assignment due to ineptness in approach. Some one must be hung to dry, it would so appear the arrow will point to his direction. {at bottom, if please to scroll, some very interesting comments will be shown}{with the former comments, are some interesting inputs to refusal of Israeli assistance as offered} Karl
|
|
|
Post by Nictoshek on Nov 22, 2010 14:13:07 GMT -7
|
|